Top Nav Menu

Archive | Uncategorized

DOT Supervisor Training Online

DOT Supervisor Training Online – $37 or less!

Looking for 60/60 drug & alcohol reasonable suspicion DOT supervisor training online?

Look no further. You can fulfill your federal requirements for a single person or your entire organization right here!

Is online training DOT compliant?

Yes. Thousands of companies utilize online training every year to fulfill the 60 minutes drug and 60 minutes alcohol reasonable suspicion supervisor training requirements for FMCSA (trucking) , FAA (aviation), FTA (transportation), USCG, PHMSA (pipeline). See the CFR regulations here.

Why online?

In person training sessions are nice but they can be expensive and hard to coordinate with trainer and employee schedules, or maybe you just need to ensure one or two employees are trained as part of their onboarding process. DVD video courses are typically outdated, poorly produced and just might put your employees into a comatose state. Employees are more likely to surf their smart phone than engage with a video. AtHandTraining’s online course can only be completed if your supervisors are engaged with the content and pass quizzes ensuring they understand the important concepts.

Top 6 benefits of using AtHandTraining’s online course:

#1. Ensure DOT compliance for 60/60 drug and alcohol reasonable suspicion training. Certificates can be generated and training records are stored online.

#2. Employees can access it from anywhere, anytime with any device: iPad, iPhone, Android phone or tablet, PC, MAC- whatever, we have you covered.

#3. Course material updated yearly – new statistics, new drugs, new photos.

#4. Supervisors are quizzed along the way ensuring a basic level of understanding of the key concepts

#5. Administrator access to employee reports

#6. It’s available right now!

Bonus #7. No clip art. Nothing says “made in 1982” like a nice piece of clip art.

Read more

 Who needs this training and how often does DOT require it be taken?

Any supervisor or employee who has the ability to initiate a reasonable suspicion drug or alcohol test and is covered under any of the Department of Transportation agencies FMCSA, FAA, FTA, USCG, PHMSA. Only FAA requires “recurring training every 12-18 months. However, DOT recommends all supervisors re-educate every two years for as best practice. See regulatory requirements for all DOT modes here.

Other online courses run anywhere from $45-$79. Why is AtHandTraining’s course only $37 or less?

Many other providers are piggy backing off of some other learning management system’s (“LMS”) software and must give a kick back to the LMS providers for every course taken. AtHandTraining manages our own system. We simply skipped the middleman.

 

Purchase and access training right now!

credit cards accepted

Click Here To Buy DOT Supervisor Course – $37 or less!

Click Here To Buy DOT Employee Drug Awareness Course – $10 or less!

athandtraining.com screenshot

Course topics – DOT Supervisor Training Online

Intro: The Drug Free Workplace Act of 1988 | Reasonable suspicion training requirements (Regulations overview) | Record keeping | Course learning objectives

The Big Picture: The effects of substance abuse on society | The effects of substance abuse on the individual and family | The effects of substance abuse in the workplace

Drug Testing: The drug testing process & safeguards | Substance Abuse Professionals | DOT substance testing | Detection times | Refusals

Alcohol Testing:  The alcohol testing process | Evidential breath tests (EBTs) | Breath Alcohol content (BAC)

Drug Classifications & Effects of Use: Depressants | Stimulants | Hallucinogens | Other drugs of abuse (K2/Spice, Bath Salts, etc.)

The Supervisors Role:  Role overview | Confidentiality | Reasonable suspicion testing | Specific, Contemporaneous, articulable definitions w/examples

Common Use Indicators: Identifying abusers | Stereotyping | Physical symptoms | Behavioral  symptoms | Mental symptoms | Job performance | Drug paraphernalia

Intervention: Crisis vs. performance scenarios | Documentation | Enabling | Confrontation and interview | Dos and don’ts | Transportation to the collection site

DOT Supervisor Training Online fulfills:

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) – 49CFR Part 382.603

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) – 14 CFR Part 121 Append I & J

Federal Transit Administration (FTA) – 49 CFR 655

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety administration (PHMSA)

U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) – §16.250   Reasonable cause testing requirements

The problem with marijuana accident statistics

The problem with marijuana accident statistics

accident

“Statistics are like bikinis.  What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital.”  ~Aaron Levenstein

Unless you’ve been in a coma tha last five years you have certainly heard many pros and cons arguments regarding the legalization of marijuana for medical and recreational use. When you consider the overall implications to society, individual’s physical and mental health, public safety, effect on minority populations, costs of enforcement, taxation, illegal markets, and so on the issue can be quite complex and difficult to come to any definite conclusions. As with most large-scale public policy issue there are valid arguments to be made supporting each side. Some arguments may never get sorted out, while others can be resolved over time as evidence builds and statistics can be compiled. A good example of this would be vaccinations. Over time we can compile reliable information regarding the safety and effectiveness of vaccinations and for the most part American society has come to accept that the pros of vaccination outweigh the cons. Even California finally caved in and passed mandatory vaccinations for public and private school students. That’s what solid, reliable, statistical data can accomplish.

In the great marijuana debate, there are a lot of claims floating about regarding whether or not marijuana use has an effect of workplace accidents. Talk to a pro-marijuana advocate and they’ll likely cite some website claiming that no or little statistical evidence exists that definitively links marijuana use to a higher rate of workplace accidents (or driving accidents). Are they right?

Many U.S. businesses are re-evaluating their workplace drug testing policies due to the rapidly changing state laws and public perception. It would be helpful for them to have conclusive evidence that marijuana either does or does not have an effect of safety. Workplace safety typically trumps all other issues. Companies can justify nearly any precaution that improves workplace safety and reduces potential liabilities.

The problem with Marijuana and workplace safety statistics

In 1987, an Amtrack/Conrail train collision near Baltimore killed 14 passengers, an engineer and car attendant. The Conrail crew failed to slow at a critical point resulting in the collision. They also tested positive for marijuana in post accident testing. The crash was instrumental in the FRA overhauling their drug and alcohol testing policy and later in 1991, Congress authorize random testing for many DOT regulated transportation industries. In 1993, in an interview with the Baltimore Sun, Ricky Lynn Gates, the Conrail engineer confessed to smoking marijuana stating that the accident would never have happened had he not been smoking marijuana. However, with all that information what was the “official cause” of the accident attributed to? It was officially listed as ”the outrageous conduct of the Conrail crew”

Where can we find reliable data?

Here’s a start…

30% of participants who consumed THC showed visible impairments in a field sobriety study – Psychopharmacology Oct 2012 223:(4) 439-446.

50% of participants showed a positive relationship between THC use and failed field sobriety tests. – 2005 Jun;180(1):107-14. Epub 2004 Dec 24.

laboratory tests and driving studies show that cannabis may acutely impair several driving-related skills in a dose-related fashion” -Am J Addict. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 May 1. Published in final edited form as: Am J Addict. 2009; 18(3): 185–193. doi:  10.1080/10550490902786934

“Drivers with blood concentrations of 13.1 ug/L THC, the psychoactive ingredient in cannabis, showed increase weaving that was similar to those with a .08 breath alcohol concentration, the legal limit in most states.” – http://time.com/3930541/marijuana-impact-driving/

“laboratory research has suggested similarly that marijuana impairs tasks of selective and divided attention, time estimation, and executive function”  & ““the acute effect of moderate or higher doses of marijuana impairs the skills related to safe driving and injury risk”, particularly “attention, tracking and psychomotor skills”  – http://adai.washington.edu/marijuana/factsheets/driving.htm

“A more recent study revealed that increasing instances of driving under the influence of marijuana are associated with an increased risk of motor vehicle accidents. More specifically, after adjusting for confounding variables, young adults in a New Zealand birth cohort who drove under the influence of marijuana more than 20 times across a 4 year period had a risk of collisions 1.4 times greater than did those who had never driven under the influence of marijuana.30 Finally, driver culpability studies have suggested that drivers testing positive to marijuana are significantly more likely to be responsible for fatal car crashes than are drug-free drivers.” – http://adai.washington.edu/marijuana/factsheets/driving.htm#sthash.hioc0SLu.dpuf 

 One more consideration

Today’s marijuana is three times stronger than that of the 70’s. So most studies performed to date are likely outdated, and testing strains that have lower psychological effects of users.

AtHandTraining.com provides awesome online training for DOT Supervisor for reasonable suspicion training and for DOT employees for drug and alcohol awareness training.

Buy now and begin training in minutes!

credit cards accepted

 

Buy DOT Supervisor Course

Buy DOT Employee Drug Awareness Course

Buy DFWP Supervisor Course

Buy FAA Recurring Course

 

 

 

 

 

 

Workplace Drug Testing in the Era of Legal Marijuana – Report Highlights

Workplace Drug Testing in the Era of Legal Marijuana – Highlights

US Map of states with legal marijuana

In March 2015, Robert L. Dupont MD of The Institue of Behavioral Health published an excellent report that all employers managing drug free workplace programs should review. The purpose of the report is to help provide some guidance to employers in an era  of chaning public opinion and fast changing states laws. 

However, if you have a short attention span like we do, it’s nice to have the Cliff’s notes version around. Here’s some of the take aways from that report.

The Challenge

As of May 2015, 23 states have passed medical marijuana laws and 4 states have approved it for use recreationally. This has caused confusion amongst employers, applicants and employees. 

  • Each state has drafted their own laws which may achieve similar results but have important nuanced differences.
  • Drug testing in the U.S. is generally categorized as “Federal” and “non-federal’ testing – with federal testing having different requirements. For example, federal testing mandates testing for marijuana where drug free workplace programs could (at risk) exclude marijuana from their testing.
  • Media regularly publishes pro-legalization drug testing related articles without providing adequate or sometimes no counterpoint comments from important organizations such as the Drug and Alcohol Testing Industry Assoc (DATIA) or American Medical Association (AMA), National Institute of Health (NIH), Department of Transportation (DOT) and other agencies.

 The Threat

Legalizing marijuana for medical or recreational purposes does not eliminate the risks it presents to safety or to a company’s bottom line. 

  • Marijuana is a psychoactive drug / mild hallucinogen
  • Marijuana is addictive to about 9% of users
  • Marijuana may increase a users vunderability to stroke
  • Even when “smoked marijuana” is provided for medical purposes is not provided using standard “dosage” standards like it is when provided as Marinol®
  • Short-term effects of marijuana use include impaired short-term memory, impaired motor coordination, altered judgment and, in high doses, paranoia and psychosis
  • There is a strong association between marijuana use and diminished lifetime achievement; motor vehicle crashes; and symptoms of chronic bronchitis

Further legalization of marijuana for medical and recreational use normalizes the use of marijuana implying to many people that its use is safe.

 The Impact of State Based Marijuana on Workplace Drug Testing

Washington DC and 23 other states have approved marijuana for medical use despite it not having been through clinical research  trials, having FDA approval or even being removed form Schedule I status. Regardless it is now seen by the public as medicine. Four states have legalized it for recreational use – directly conflicting with federal law. Some employers are now opting to remove marijuana from their testing program or are treating it as a substance with legitimate medical explaination meaning a laboratory positive could be overturned by a medical review officer if a doctor patient relationship can be verified.

The marijuana positivity rates increased 20 percent in Colorado and 23 percent in Washington. Given the upward trend in marijuana use nationally and the changing state-based laws with regard to marijuana, employers must address marijuana use in the workplace and not fall prey to the misinformation surrounding this threat to employee health and safety.

For federal drug testing programs there simply is no change. Persons testing positive for marijuana are removed from performing safety sensitive duties, may be forced to change positions, are required to engage with an substance abuse professional, have to pass a return-to-duty test and may be terminated. There is no scenario where a medical review officer would overturn a marijuana positive test even if the person had reveived a medical marijuana referral and have done so in adherance with thier local state laws.

 Advice to Employers

  • Look at the big picture: Marijuana represents a threat to safety in the workplace and to your employees health and well being. Opiate-based drugs are prescribed legally and under dosage but still represent a huge risk as does alcohol.
  • Understand the legal complications: Many states have specifically addressed marijuana in their medical marijuana laws requiring an employer to show impairment before taking action against an applicant or employee who tests positive for marijuana. These provisions should be accounted for in your drug free workplace policy.
  • Consider a per se or “Zero tolerance” policy: A zero tolerance policy can help employers avoind having to prove impairment which is where state laws can get super complicated – particularly for organizations operating in multiple states. A zero tolerance policy a strict standard of no use, period. A compoany following a zero tolerance policy would essentially be following the standard set by the federal goverment for their own regulated testing programs (DOT, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Dept. of Defense).
  • Avoid Politically Derived Psuedoscience: In order to pass legislation, proponents of marijuana had to address the issue of driving under influence. In Washington State, they came up with an arbitrary 5ng/ml blood THC level limit to prove impairment. The problem is that THC can be consumed in a variety of ways (eating, smoking, “dabbing”/ inhailed) and enter the bloodstream at different rates over time, thus a one-off blood test does little to provide a true mesaure of impairment. According to the report “It is possible that employers who make the mistake of thinking that they will simply “mirror the state law” and use such a permissive standard for THC in blood for employees may find themselves on the wrong end of litigation down the road when employees cause injury or death after having tested positive for marijuana without being required to be drug-free as a condition of their employment.”
  • Provide Clairity in Drug Free Workplace Programs: Your workplace drug policy is the rulebook. It should clearly define the elements of the drug testing program including who is subject to testing, how testing is administered, how positive results are confirmed, and what the consequences are for positive drug test results. Supervisors and human resources staff should be trained in the employers’ substance use policies and procedures and be able to explain them to all employees and job applicants.Employers conducting workplace drug testing should provide educational opportunities for employees about substance abuse. Programs focused on wellness and/or employee assistance programs should provide education, screening and follow-up services for employees’ drug and alcohol problems. This may include return-to-work agreements provided through employee assistance programs. Provisions for assisting employees with substance use problems should be known to all employees. Encouraging employees to seek treatment confidentially, apart from a testing event, without jeopardizing their jobs is a practice that can help guide employees to recovery. As part of a drug-free workplace, an employer’s substance use policy should address employees under the influence and it should provide training to identify behaviors and related signs and symptoms of substance use.
  • Specifically Address Marijuana in the Drug Free Workplace Policy

Download the full IBH report here

AtHand Training provides awesome online training for DOT Supervisor for reasonable suspicion training and for DOT employees for drug and alcohol awareness training.

Buy now and begin training in minutes!

Buy DOT Supervisor Course

Buy DOT Employee Drug Awareness Course

Buy DFWP Supervisor Course

Buy FAA Recurring Course